Home
1-luan-an-thac-si
khoa-hoc-xa-hoi-thac-si
An investigation into modality markers used in political speeches by US presidents
[giaban]0.000 VNĐ[/giaban]
[kythuat]
[/kythuat]
[tomtat]
[tomtat]
An
investigation into modality markers used in political speeches by US presidents
TABLE
OF CONTETS
CHAPTER
1 INTRODUCTION
1.1.
RATIONALE
1.2.
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY
1.3.
THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY
1.4.
RESEARCH QUESTIONS
1.5.
SCOPE OF THE STUDY
1.6.
ORGANIZATION OF THE STUDY
Chapter
2 LITERATURE REVIEW AND THEORETICAL BACKGROUND
2.1.
LITERATURE REVIEW
2.2.
THEORETICAL BACKGROUND
2.2.1.
Modality and Related Terms
2.2.2.
Kinds of modality
2.2.3.
Engagement and Dialogistic Positioning
2.3.
THE SYNTACTIC REALISATIONS OF MODAL MEANINGS
2.4.
POLITICS AND POLITICAL SPEECH
2.4.1.
Politics
2.4.2.
Political Speech as a Type of Discourse
2.4.3.
Political Speech as a type of Public Speaking
2.5.
SUMMARY
Chapter
3 METHODOLOGY
3.1.
RESEARCH DESIGN
3.2.
METHODS AND PROCEDURES
3.2.1.
Method of Study
3.2.2.
Collecting Data
3.3.
BUILDING CORPUS
3.4.
DATA DESCRIPTION AND ANALYSIS
3.5.
RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY
Chapter
4 LINGUISTIC FEATURES OF MODALITY MARKERS IN POLITICAL SPEECHES
4.1
SYNTACTIC CHARACTERISTICS OF MODALITY MARKERS
4.2.
THE SEMANTIC CHARACTERISTICS OF MODALITY MARKERS IN POLITICAL SPEECHES: DEGREE
OF ENGAGEMENT
4.2.1.
Modality Markers Expressing High Engagement
4.2.2.
Modality Markers Expressing Low Engagement
4.3.
PRAGMATIC CHARACTERISTICS OF MODALITY MARKERS IN POLITICAL SPEECHES: STRATEGIES
OF COMMUNICATION
4.3.1.
Speaker-oriented Messages
4.3.2.
Content-oriented Messages
4.3.3.
Hearer-oriented Messages
4.4.
SUMMARY
Chapter
5 CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS
5.1.
CONCLUSION
5.2.
IMPLICATIONS
5.2.1.
Implications to the Vietnamese learners of English
5.2.2.
Implications to the English Teaching
Bài viết liên quan